except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 26, 2014, at around 13:15, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the front of Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, and was urged to return home from D’s security guards belonging to the Guro Police Station C District of the Guro Police Station, and without any particular reason, D, a police officer, “Woo Habk Habk Habk Habbk walk kn the front part of the police officer, and obstructed the police officer’s performance of official duties to maintain the order of the police officer by force by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of each police station;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code has no basic field of obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months), and there is no criminal history of the defendant [decision of sentence]. The defendant appears to have the attitude of recognizing and opposing the facts of the crime in this case, and other circumstances, such as the background, means and method of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's environment, etc., and the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Code, which are shown in the records and arguments, shall be determined as the disposition.