In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Defendant

A is the director who operates the apartment house C in Ansan-gu, Manyang-si, and D 101, and the defendant B is the husband of the defendant who is the driver of the above child-care center.

On November 10, 2017, the Defendants conspired to enter Defendant B into the Child Care Integration System (cpms. chtil.go.go.) falsely as if he was the child care teacher in exclusive charge of the above child care center and applied for subsidies, which shall be KRW 220,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (the submission of detailed data on administrative dispositions against the party to D Child Care Centers);

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provision on criminal facts: Articles 347(1) and 30 (the fraudulent point) of the Criminal Act; Article 54(2)1 of the Infant Care Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the illegal receipt of subsidies)

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose punishment: Fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act