However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. At around 01:00 on May 4, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business affairs by force, such as: (a) around 01:0, the victim’s entertainment bar operated in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the victim’s entertainment bar”); and (b) the victim spawned with other customers who had been engaged in drinking together with his/her spawn B and East-in F; and (c) the victim spawned his/her voice to “I spath from this spath, I spath from this spathn, I spathn from this spathn; and (d) the victim spawnd from this spathn; and (e) having other customers out of the said spa

B. On the same day, at around 02:07 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports on the same reason; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s performance of official duties in relation to the handling of the 112-reports by the police officer; and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s performance; (d) the police officer, who was the victim, sent to the police officer of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Police Station G Police Station G police box; and (e) the police officer, who was the victim, expressed that “cins, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, shots, and shots the above I’s back part of the back-up body; and (e) the police officer’s back-up part of the above H’s bridge was boomed by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties for about 14 days; and (e) the said I sprinked sprink

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place, and on the ground that police officers dispatched for the foregoing reason failed to perform the above A’s act, the Defendant 2 expressed that “police kidds all the kids kids kids kids kids kids kids kid by the police,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Report Cases on the ground that the police officers kid against the above A’s act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I, H, J, and E;

1. E statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The application of the laws and regulations of the International Medical Certificate of Injury (I).