beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.07 2014고단452

절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court for one year and a suspended sentence for six months.

30. The sentence became final and conclusive.

At around 10:00 on January 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim’s D store located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, in a bank prepared in advance for the amount equivalent to KRW 15,000 at the market value of 5th, such as “the revised sunken area,” which was possessed by the victim Co., Ltd. D Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant stolen the right of KRW 5,520,500 in a total amount of 21 times from January 11, 2013 to January 6, 2014, by means of emergency stairs; and (b) cutting off the victim’s religious book at the market value of KRW 5,520,500 in a total of 21 times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement of E, and the written statement of E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each investigation report and each investigation report;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes is identical to the defendant several times. A sentence is inevitable on the following grounds: (a) the defendant repeatedly committed the same mistake against the same victim during the period of suspension of execution due to the crime that steals three rights of sexual concurrences in D; and (b) the injury has not been recovered. However, the sentence is rendered as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, such as the fact that the defendant’s mistake is seriously against the defendant; (c) the fact that the defendant was transferred to the elderly and was committed in the state of economic difficulties; and (d) the