beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.14 2019나71103

신용카드이용대금

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court is modified in accordance with the defendants' succession to the lawsuit as prescribed in paragraph 2.

2.(a)

network of the decedent;

Reasons

1. According to the arguments and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, as well as the whole pleadings, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff obtained the approval of re-determination of the deceased deceased B 6,816,504 won ( principal 6,625,775 won, overdue interest rate of 190,729 won up to September 4, 2013, interest rate of 29.9% per annum). The defendant B who was the defendant of the first instance died on July 13, 2015, after the closure of the pleadings of the first instance court, on December 27, 2018, the defendants who were his co-inheritors obtained the approval of re-determination of KRW 2015,500 and 1131 as deceased deceased B x 207,975 won x 379,750 won (=) x 365,7565% per annum, 296, 3765 and 975).7

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices who reviewed the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the defendants' lawsuit acceptance.