2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The status of the parties A and B is the parents of the network H (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Plaintiff C are the births of the deceased.

On the other hand, Defendant D is the J members of the said mountain conference as the faculty members of the mountain conference, Defendant E and Defendant G as the faculty members of the said industrial conference, and the members of Defendant E as Defendant E.

B. (i) The Deceased, as the president of the Mountain Association of the IAF, is the head of the said Mountain Association, J and K members from January 24, 2015.

2. From January 25, 2015 to September 8, 2015, he participated in the 2015 Eastern Training Team, which reflects snowic acid and nearby ice walls, one string in the camping site which is linked with Defendant E, F, and G, which was conducted one string on January 24, 2015, and from May 25, 2015, the ice strings were conducted from the 'M in the Gangwon-si L of Gangwon-gun from January 25, 2015.

Doshe, however, ice ice ice ice ice ice ices were iced when the deceased ice ice ice ice ices were removed from the body of the deceased, and the deceased transferred the ice ice ice to the N Hospital located in the Si, and received first aid treatment by the rescue team, and then transferred the ice ice ice ice to the Asan Hospital located in the Gu of Gangseo-si. However, at around 17:00 on the same day, the deceased died due to second damage.

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant E, F, and G for the crime of occupational negligence. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant E, F, and G.

However, the early branch office in the Chuncheon District Public Prosecutor's Office is ① the activities of the same club, and it is not recognized that the work is not continuous in accordance with the social status. ② The above Defendants are led by the K members including the Deceased, and the above Defendants are not in the guarantor status. ③ There is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the Defendants voluntarily changed training schedule or ordered the Deceased to change the ice, and ④ it can be concluded that the above Defendants and the Deceased could have anticipated the ice removal at the time of the ice removal.