If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On February 6, 2012, the Defendant sent the victim C’s e-mail to the head of the Tong, “C president well read,” which is the title “D,” and is designated as such business entity with no percentage, and the approval of the business plan itself cannot be deemed to have been publicly announced or announced by submitting fake and fraudulent documents, or by submitting the approval of the business plan. (m) At the Gyeongnam-do, this case would be deemed to be null and void. Ultimately, this case and the interested parties recorded in the copy of the register of the name of the company would raise fraud, and eventually, it would be 0 years have passed since the victim’s 10th anniversary of the fact that the Defendant, on June 20, 2012, sent the victim’s e-mail to the web site, which is substantially subject to the application of No. 80% of the e-mail in the process of performing the urban development project, including the victim’s e-mail and the e-mail in the process of implementation of the project.

'' posts the contents of the article.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information with the aim of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. News & TWn Equipment (F).