전기요금에 대한 매입세액 공제의 경정청구를 거부한 처분은 적법함[국승]
Busan District Court 2010Guhap3313 (Ob. 18, 2011)
Cho High Court Decision 2010Da1145 (2010.06.04)
The disposition rejecting a request for correction of input tax deduction on electric charges is legitimate.
(1) The disposition rejecting a request for correction of input tax deduction on the electric charges is legitimate, since there is an electric charge actually used as a consumer for the purpose of leasing business, and if so, the amount cannot be specified to some extent, and it is also insufficient to recognize the fact that the person who has paid the electric charge is the Plaintiff.
2011Nu137. Revocation of revocation of a claim for rectification of value-added tax
Gangwon A
○ Head of tax office
Busan District Court Decision 2010Guhap3313 Decided February 18, 201
May 27, 2011
June 17, 201
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. Costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on October 5, 2009 against the plaintiff on October 5, 2009 shall be revoked from the first to the first half of 2007.
The reason is that the "only evidence" of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance is "only evidence and evidence Nos. 10-1 to 3," and the reason is that the 5th and 6th judgment "the fact that the person who paid the electricity fee is the plaintiff" is "the fact that the plaintiff is the person who directly bears the electricity fee". The reason is that the judgment of the court of first instance is stated.
Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance which dismissed the plaintiff's claim is just and dismissed.