2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 4, 2014, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in driving of the CGp car. On January 4, 2014, at around 01:25, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car on a two-lane road in front of the Dorog middle school located in the Doro-Eup of Pyeongtaek-si; (b) the two-lane apartment complex was opened in front of the Dorog middle school located in the Doro-Eup; and (c) at night and at that time, the place is installed with the center line of the yellow-ray, and (d) the Defendant was negligent in performing the duty of care for driving the vehicle thoroughly at the front time and safely, but the Defendant was negligent in driving the vehicle while driving the central line, and the Defendant did not cause any injury to the victim, such as the victim’s D(37 years old) in front of the left-hand part of the Doro vehicle in front of the Dorog-Eup, and did not cause any damage to the victim’s 7-day.

2. The Defendant, at around 01:26 of the same day, driven the said scam car and proceeded with the entrance of the third-class apartment complex located in the Doro-Eup in Pyeongtaek-si. In such a case, at night and where the place was installed a crosswalk at the front, the Defendant had a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service was a person to reduce speed and to scam well see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle. However, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of driving the scam f(33) of the victim crossing the scambing the scam at the right and the front glass part of the scam.