A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. In light of the facts alleged by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable, even in light of the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, as well as the fact that it appears to be against the police officers who committed the assault in return for additional payment or deposit of the money as compensation for damages, and the reasons for sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 25(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the 5th page of the judgment below, the "written reply to inquiry about criminal history, etc.," is added to "the number of personal identifications