If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20 on September 20, 2013, the victim C (the age of 50) was able to open the restaurant to the restaurant; (b) the customer was able to open the restaurant; and (c) the victim continued to report to the police; and (d) the victim was able to fluorddd by her hand with the overwing paper citing the driver’s seat on the table so that he was fluor; (c) the victim was fluored with the table, and the victim was fluord by 55 minutes on the table, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports, and the details of reporting and withdrawal with respect to the suspected person;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;