"2018 Highest 1218"

1. On June 24, 2010, the Defendant against the victim C lent KRW 5 million to E office in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the 1st floor of the victim’s operation of the 1st floor of the D D Building, and to F employees of the victim’s “one unit of the G e-sports cargo vehicle in the internal-owned vehicle as security” to F employees of the victim. If so, the same year is applicable.

8. Until 24.24. The above borrowed money will be repaid without recourse.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the damaged party in a situation where it is difficult to raise living expenses due to the burden of 20 million won loans from various lending enterprises, including mountain and money, without any particular property.

As above, the defendant deceivings the above F and acquired 4,400,000 won in cash after deducting 600,000 won from the victim's prior interest and 600,000 won on the same day from the victim.

2. On August 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) introduced K2.5 tons of the cargo to I, which is the affiliated vehicle of the J-based corporation, that was introduced by the victim upon the request of the victim, in the mutual influent restaurant located in the G-si in the G-dong of Gwangju City; and (b) introduced K2.5 tons of the cargo to I, which is the affiliated vehicle of the J-based corporation, that was introduced by the victim upon the request of the victim, in order to enter into the above consignment management contract between I and the said corporation, including the Defendant’s introduction fee of KRW 2 million; (c) around September 7, 201, I remitted KRW 41 million to the victim; (d) however, on September 9, 2011, the above consignment management contract was rescinded and the victim returned the above purchase price to I. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23283, Sep. 2011>

On October 7, 2011, the Defendant was transferred to a national bank account in the name of the father of the Defendant to the victim and kept the above KRW 39 million for the victim, at his/her own discretion around that time, after deducting KRW 2 million from the introduction cost of the Defendant already paid to him/her, at KRW 41 million, upon request from the victim from the victim from the victim from the victim in the French land.