On July 29, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim EF, operated by the victim D in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, to send 189 members of the Jeju Agricultural Cooperative and rice 10kg of rice 10kg of rice g, 10 ppuri 5 ppuri g, and 60,000 won of the price to the victim in ten installments.

After concluding a false statement to the effect that if you send 1 sets of mountain ginseng 1 to the members of the Union, you will transfer to the members of the Union the total sales proceeds to be received 70% of the members of the Union, you will transfer to the members of the Union the installment claim against the members of the Union. After concluding a contract to transfer to the victim and the members of the Defendant, rice 10 km rice 10 gg, 10 ppuri 5 ppuri 10 ppuri 1, 100 g, and 5 ppuri 1,000.

However, at the time, the above union members could settle the Internet advertisement with points generated by the Defendant, or the main agricultural cooperative was provided with rice and mountain scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim pay the above members of the 7,560,000 won of the market price to pay the 189,000,000 won of the 7,560,000 won, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A contract for the transfer of bonds, a list of the names of the contracting parties to the contract for purchase of goods in installments, i.e., rice tin, a contract for the supply of rice from static rice (189 persons) and telephone communications on gold management;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the phone survey of a contractor for rice supply).