정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The court of first instance held that: (a) the e-mail of this case was sent to the victim with no knowledge of the defendant 47 times through the expression that the victim did not harm the life and body of the victim or his family members; (b) the contents and frequency of transmission of the e-mail of this case; and (c) the relationship between the defendant and the victim; and (d) the e-mail of this case was sent to the victim's office; (c) the contents and frequency of transmission of the e-mail of this case; (d) the e-mail of this case was sent to the victim; (e) the victim, as the e-mail of this case, led to fear and apprehension of harm to the life and body of the victim; and (e) the court of first instance held that the e-mail of this case did not contain fear or apprehension; and (e) the victim's e-mail was sent to the victim with no knowledge of the victim's own consciousness, and thus, (e) the judgment of the court below was justified and acceptable.
3. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Defendant’s appeal under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.