beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.09.17 2014고단1868

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Each request for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2006, from around October 2010 to around October 201, the Defendant used to place a name named in the name of the “asset management planning team leader” or “the head of the Strategy Investment Headquarters team leader,” etc. of interesting life, and committed the following crimes with mind that he/she received the investment money after deceiving him/her as if he/she was the fund manager of interesting life, and used it as living expenses, etc.

1. On March 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E’s home located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 105 Dong 1201, the victim E, stating, “The victim E would make an investment on the side of the shares and make an investment. The Defendant would pay interest of 20% in the principal around August 2010 if he/she made an investment to B.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he was planned to use it as his own cost of living without investing in the shares, and he did not have any intention or ability to repay it to the victim.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving him, is the same year from the victim.

3. Around 22.2. Around the 20.m., a post office account in the name of the Defendant was remitted with KRW 50 million under the name of stock investment.

2. On May 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, who was employed by the victim G in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, as the team leader of the interesting strategic office, “at the rate of return exceeding 40% may be increased when he/she receives money.” From March 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “to return all the principal and profits until March 201.”

However, the defendant did not have worked as the leader of the strategic planning office for interesting life, and even if he received money from the victim, he was planned to use it as his own cost of living without investing in the shares, and did not have any intent or ability to complete payment.

The Defendant is the victim.