beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.06.21 2017고정2068

명예훼손

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around April 25, 2014, the Defendant was dismissed on the ground that he/she had been working as a taxi engineer for the victim B Co., Ltd., Ltd., and was dismissed on the ground that he/she failed to comply with the request for remedy, but the Defendant was dismissed on August 8, 2014, and subsequently filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of dismissal, etc. with the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) on March 16, 2016, but the judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

1. From April 7, 2017 to May 18, 2017, the Defendant’s defamation in front of the Dobong-gu Office was in front of the Dobong-gu Office in Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, 656, and the fact that the Defendant was justifiable to dismiss the Defendant, despite the fact that the Defendant was “in spite of the fact that the Defendant’s dismissal against taxi workers is legitimate, the Defendant’s failure to impose additional tax reduction and exemption by the representative of the dispute resolution committee, is found to be unfair.

”, “ 부가 세 미지급 분에 대한 해명을 하라!! 부당 해고는 갑의 횡포다

A banner stating the content of “” was posted and read from time to time by micro-using the relevant phrase, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. (State) On May 29, 2017, the Defendant’s defamation Co., Ltd., located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., even though the Defendant’s dismissal of the Defendant is justifiable, the Defendant’s dismissal of the Defendant is determined as follows: “In spite of the fact that the Defendant’s dismissal of the taxi workers, the Defendant’s additional tax reduction and exemption by the representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd

“The” and “assumed C of the content in question.”

by posting a ticket stating the content “,” thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

The Defendant, on March 16, 2009, was employed as a taxi engineer on March 16, 2009 and was punished as of April 25, 2014, and the Defendant asserted that he was unfair dismissal, and the Defendant claimed that he was unfair dismissal, against the victim B, filed an application for remedy for unfair dismissal and unfair labor practices with the National Labor Relations Commission, and was dismissed as of August 8, 2014.