A. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s cell phone phone and divided conversations related to the implementation of the apartment sales contract into the victim’s cell phone; (b) thereby threatening the victim by saying, “If the victim was to have a criminal prosecution in the Republic of Korea, to have been employed by the prosecution of Seoul, and to have the executive officer who should be employed in the process of internal investigation into the prosecution of Seoul, to have been employed in this sense, I need to see that the victim would have come to this sense; and (c) I am now I me now, I me will be able to take disciplinary action, take the shot, and get off the clothes if she made a mistake.”

나. 피고인은 2016. 11. 22. 09:55 경 피해자의 휴대전화로 전화하여 아파트 매매계약 이행과 관련한 대화를 나누던 중 피해자에게 “ 내가 더 이상 뭐 어떻게 여 지를 내가 줄 거 없고, 나 저기 형사 진행을 할 거니까, 거기에 대해서 불이익이 어떻게 갈지 그거는 곰곰이 한번 생각해 보고, C 씨가 아직 한참 젊은데, 어떤 뭐 살아가는데 걸림이 나는 되게 하고 싶지 않았어.

However, if you can do so, I would like to know so.

The victim threatened the victim on the ground that it is not a clater at all the clater of the clater by raising a flateral flater, b) flating flat, and flating flat, and that it is criminal and criminal, and that it is clat to file a complaint, disciplinary action, complaint, accusation, complaint, internal charge, police blat, flat, flat, flat, and flat, flat, and flated.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, and the facts charged in the instant case are recorded in the trial records of this case.