2. There is no change in circumstances in the trial concerning the sentencing of the judgment, and the lower court has already determined the punishment by fully taking account of all circumstances that the Defendant already asserted as the grounds for appeal.

In particular, in full view of the fact that the Defendant was used for scaming crimes against his name impaired persons, the sentencing precedents of similar cases, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the environment, and the background of the crime, the lower court’s punishment does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion regarding sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.