공문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who works as an employee at the Credit Business Association Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) (hereinafter “instant company”).
The Defendant, while running a business to the customer C, had C enter into two life insurance policies with respect to the instant company. However, if the head office of the instant company is excessive in the amount of life insurance, the Defendant came to contact with C to approve the purchase of insurance policies by submitting documents proving C’s income, etc.
Accordingly, the Defendant, by forging and forging a certificate of income amount issued in the name of the head of a female tax office with respect to C, had the intent to obtain insurance approval from the head office.
On May 29, 2020, the Defendant copied a certificate of income amount issued in the name of the head of then tax office for E in the name of the head of the above project team for leisure and management of the company in question, which was located in D and D, and II, around May 29, 2020. The Defendant made a copy of the certificate of income amount issued in the name of the head of then tax office for E in the name of the head of the project team for leisure and management of the said project team; the name column “E” as “C”; the address column “F apartment and G in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Seoul Special Metropolitan City” as “I, 730,192 won” in the resident registration number column as “152,730,192 won”; and the head of the tax office having issued the certificate “6,987,054 won” as “the number of income amount issued on May 21, 201” as “the date of 200,54.
Accordingly, the defendant has forged a certificate of income under the name of the head of a female tax office which is an official document for the purpose of exercising the official document.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph 1, sent a certificate of income in the name of the head of the relevant tax office, which is a forged official document, to the person in charge of the instant company by facsimile, and exercised the same by filing an application for approval of the insurance with C, etc., without knowledge of forgery.
Summary of Evidence
1...