However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

【2012 Highest 4890 case】 around June 25, 2011, the Defendant came into the E apartment apartment elderly zone managed by D located in Gwangju Southern-gu, Gwangju-gu, at around 23:30 on June 25, 201, and then, in order to find a stolen object after intrusion into the said apartment zone through an unrecied glass window, the Defendant removed the 20,000 Swiss even if it was planned to find the stolen object, and then stolen approximately KRW 1,200 for 10 for 10 for 10 to 10 to 10 to 20 to

【2012 Godan4561 case】 On November 12, 2011, the Defendant: (a) cut drinking water from the Hestus operated by the victim G in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju on November 23:40, 201; (b) the victim opened a small credit cooperative located inside the seat of the toilet and cut down KRW 150,00,000 in total, KRW 50,000,000,000.

In addition, from November 12, 201 to July 7, 2012, the Defendant stolen the property equivalent to KRW 1,735,000 in total on seven occasions, such as the statement in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

【2012 Highest 4890 Cases】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. 【2012 Highest 4561 Case】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each entry in G, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which an investigation report is recorded;

1. Relevant Article 330 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to criminal facts, the choice of punishment (the points of larceny at night) and Article 329 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Although the number of offenses in this case for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is small, the victims are not subject to punishment due to the smooth agreement between the defendant and a considerable number of victims during the trial of this case, and there is still no record of punishment against the defendant.