If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

"2014 Highest 35"

1. On July 3, 2014, at around 22:50 on July 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant to change room on credit in the Bncheon-gun, Yacheon-gun, Yacheon-gun, Yacheon-gun, Yacheon-gun, but was refused from the victim C, the proprietor of the innife, the Defendant: (b) removed the windows of the innife-gun glass; (c) removed them from the entrance door on the side; and (d) destroyed and damaged the windows of the

2. In the above date, at the above time and place, the injured Defendant: (a) taken the face of the victim D (V, 53 years old); (b) one time at the Defendant’s hand floor, the injured Defendant got about two weeks from the victim’s eye, and was inception of snow grass and eye strings that require treatment for about two weeks.

around 16:10 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant 2014 Gocheon-Ma399 stated that, while he consulted with the E officer F in charge, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the Yongsan-gu Office located in the Geumcheon-gun, Ycheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-do, the Defendant 201 was saying, “I would like to see the E officer F in a clear spirit on a daily day” from the above F on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and there was no address for gathering, “I would like to have no address for gathering,” and the Defendant damaged the table table for contact, which is a public object managed by the above Yongcheon-do Office, thereby damaging the 119,500 Won of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is recognized to have committed the crime of this case during the period of suspension of execution, but the defendant has a deep depth of the error, and the damage of this case.