2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance at the occurrence of liability for damages.

(Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). 3. Grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the scope of liability for damages are set forth in Article 3-B of the judgment of the first instance.

In addition to using paragraphs (1) and (2) as follows, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the calculation table of damages in attached Form 1 to the end of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(B) Personal information of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (main sentence of Article 420) . (b) 1: as indicated in the “basic matters in the calculation table of the amount of damages compensation”: (a) The gist of the Plaintiffs’ assertion regarding the Plaintiffs’ claim regarding the “simultaneous term” should be deemed to be August 27, 2031, rather than August 27, 2031, “before he/she attains the age of 60,” and as of August 26, 2032, the “before he/she attains the age of 60” rather than August 27, 2031, which is “before he/she attains the age of 60”; and (b) the Plaintiff A has cultivated his/her own farmland as the head of office of the office of ordinary attorney-at-law, and therefore, the maximum working age should be determined by the fact-finding court from the date of retirement to August 27, 2036.) The presumption of the presumption of the maximum working age from labor experience or work regulations.

(See Supreme Court Decision 200Da59920, Mar. 9, 2001). First, according to the records on the maximum working age of Plaintiff A’s attorney-at-law as the head of the office of attorney-at-law, according to the evidence No. 20, Plaintiff A is recognized as having attended a doctor’s degree course at K University graduate school.