beta
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2020.09.22 2020가단102318

물품대금

Text

1. The Plaintiff is within the scope of the property inherited from the network E, Defendant B is within the scope of the property, Defendant B is within the scope of KRW 29,535,342, Defendant C and D, respectively.

Reasons

The Plaintiff, a food manufacturer, supplied the Defendant’s decedent E (food Materials Supplier) with various food materials, was 68,915,800, and due to the death of the Plaintiff on April 12, 2020, the Plaintiff succeeded to the Deceased in the shares of Defendant B 3/7, Defendant C, and D 2/7, respectively. The fact that the Defendants was adjudicated to accept the report of the re-approval of inheritance under the Busan Family Court Decision 2020Ra20709 on August 24, 2020 by taking the decedent as the deceased on August 24, 2020 is either a dispute between the parties, or that the Defendants did not have any dispute between the parties, or that the entire purport of the pleadings as stated in the evidence No. 1 through 7, and No. 1 are recognized by taking into account the overall

Therefore, within the scope of the property inherited from the network E, Defendant B is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum under the Commercial Act from July 21, 2020, which is the day following the day when the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff with respect to the amount corresponding to 19,690,228 (i.e., 68,915,800 won x 2/7) and the amount corresponding to 29,535,342 won (i.e., 68,915,80 won x 68,915,800 won x 2/7), and from the following day of the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff, to the day of this decision, to the day of complete payment, 6% per annum under the same Act; and 12%

The plaintiff's claim is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.