2. Although the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case when he was in a trial, there is a favorable condition against his mistake, the defendant was punished seven times as a crime of fraud and committed again despite the fact that he had been punished twice as a violation of the Labor Standards Act, despite the fact that he had the record of being punished twice as a violation of the Labor Standards Act, the defendant committed the crime of this case again, and the defendant was aware that the victim was physically disabled and was less incapable of judgment compared to the general public, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the damage amount caused by the crime of this case did not reach 70 million won and did not completely recover from damage, and all the sentencing conditions of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as inappropriate. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.