In such cases, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of motor vehicles to live well on the front side and drive safely by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the stopane which the victim C (ma, 70 years old) drives in the front bank while neglecting the duty of the stopia, and did not discover the stopane and shock the back part of the victim's stopia with the front part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered a serious injury on the part of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as an occupational negligence on the part of the victim, due to an infectious disease on the part of the left-hand side.

2. Determination

(a) Relevant Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts charged for the applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment dismissing public prosecution under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (when a victim expresses his/her wish not to prosecute a case which cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed intention, or where a declaration of

(b) Declaration of intention of not to grant punishment: Submission of an agreement on October 22, 2019, which is after a public prosecution is instituted;