전기용품안전관리법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the purport of the defendant's grounds for appeal (unfairness) reflects his fault and the fact that the defendant should support his wife and self-satis, as a person with a disability of the first degree who suffers from chronic renal failure, as well as his son, the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and forfeiture is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is that each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of the period and frequency of the crime, that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months at the Suwon District Court on September 11, 2013 to a violation of the Electric Appliances Safety Control Act and committed each of the crimes of this case in the same manner during the suspended sentence period, and that the defendant was sentenced to a prison term of eight months at the Suwon District Court on January 28, 1993 and was sentenced to a criminal punishment for fraud, and that the defendant could have a record of being sentenced to criminal punishment. Considering the motive and background of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's character and behavior as shown in the records and arguments, the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.