2. The Defendant recognized the facts charged and reflected in the facts charged, and the victims were aware of the drinking alcohol of the Defendant, and the Defendant does not want the punishment of the Defendant.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant driven a vehicle with a considerably high blood alcohol content of 0.129% and received retaining walls; (b) the victim D suffered serious injury in need of treatment for two months; (c) the victims were not subject to comprehensive insurance because the comprehensive insurance, which was subscribed to the instant vehicle, became a special agreement for age limitation; and (d) other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, are considered unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.