성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. The summary of the reasoning of the appeal is unreasonable as the punishment against the Defendants (a fine of three million won) of the lower judgment is too uneased.
2. In light of the following facts: (a) the Defendants had no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (b) Defendant A was the first offender; and (c) Defendant B had no record of punishment except for the punishment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; (d) the period of the instant crime does not extend and the profits the Defendants acquired therefrom are deemed not much high; and (e) the Defendants are in depth and are taking measures to prevent recurrence; (b) the Defendants’ age, family relation, career, motive for the crime, economic situation, and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.