명예훼손
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against Defendant A is publicly announced.
1. Although the Defendants appealed on the grounds of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the Prosecutor applied for changes in the indictment of this case as stated in paragraph (1) below (the judgment which is written in multiple ways). Since this Court permitted this and changed the subject of the judgment, the judgment of the court below is no longer maintained in this respect.
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment below is reversed and it is decided as follows.
【Discretionary Judgment】
1. Defendant A of the facts charged in the instant case is the auditor of the council of occupants' representatives at Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 14, the auditor of Defendant B, and the management director of Defendant C. The victim E is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives at issue, the victim F is the general director, and the victim G
피고인들과 C는 2018. 1. 19.경 서울 도봉구 D아파트에서, “주민 여러분! 우리의 재산을 지킵시다.”라는 제목으로 “몇몇의 동대표들이 우리의 재산을 눈먼 돈으로 생각 하나 봅니다. 아파트 재도장 공사를 13기에서 8-9억 하는 공사를 14기 대표회의에서 몇몇 동대표들이 17-18억 정도의 견적서를 제시하여 공사를 강행 하려 합니다(이하 ‘제1표현’이라 한다). 투명하고 공정치 못한 “단 3개의 공법”만으로 제한하여 수많은 도색 공사업체들의 입찰 기회조차 주지 않으려합니다. 왜 투명하게 공사입찰을 하지 않을까요 (이하 ‘제2표현’이라 한다)“라는 등의 내용이 기재된 유인물을 출력하여 위 아파트 게시판과 방화문 등에 부착하고, 같은 달 20.경 같은 내용의 유인물을 아파트 입주민들에게 배포하였다.
However, in fact, the 13th council of occupants' representatives receives an estimate of the total construction cost of KRW 8-900,000 in relation to the apartment re-building.