beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.26 2014고정1098

퇴거불응등

Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 4, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Suwon District Court on the 12th of the same month and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 10th of the same month.

On July 17, 2013, at around 22:20 on July 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the victim returned home with the victim, who was suffering from livering while drinking e and drinking together with the victim, was suffering from livering e and drinking together with the victim; and (b) demanded the Defendant to leave her place of residence without good cause; (c) however, the Defendant called “nurging nurg” as “nurging nurg” and, without good cause, required to leave her place of residence.

The Gu did not comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the 9th trial date);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness F and D's respective statutory statements;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act (the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act takes into account: (a) some of the circumstances to be considered in the course of the crime of this case; (b) the victim is not punishable against the defendant; (c) the recognition of and reflects the error; and (d) the crime for