2. The Defendant, who made a confession and reflects on the crime, is not subject to the previous conviction and sentence. However, the Defendant, as the president of the Scholarship Council, arbitrarily forges audit report and meeting minutes of the board of directors under the name of E and uses them, and the nature of the crime is not good.

In addition, considering all sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, family relation, relationship with the victim, living environment, motive, details and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is adequate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.