A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, which is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts and affected the conclusion of the judgment, by misunderstanding the facts.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (the penalty amount of KRW 700,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들 즉, ① 원 심 법정에 증인으로 출석하여 이 사건 공소사실에 부합하는 증언을 한 피해자의 진술이 구체적이고 주요 부분에 있어 일관되어 신빙성이 있는 점, ② 피해자가 이 사건 발생 직후 포항 성모병원 응급실에서 목과 복부 부위 통증으로 치료를 받은 점, ③ 피고인과 피해자 사이에서 싸움을 말렸고 싸움이 종료된 직후 피고인을 병원에 데려 다 준 E이 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 “ 서로 멱살을 잡았고 피고인이 피해자의 배 부분을 발로 3 차례 정도 찼다.

The statement "," 4. The wife of the defendant stated in the investigative agency ", as the head of fat, fat together with her husband, and her husband made the victim.

The husband has taken the part of the victim's clothes and the chest part.

In full view of the statement "," it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim, and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the fact as pointed out by the defendant in the judgment below.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

B. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that there are circumstances to consider the background of the instant crime and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, on the other hand, the Defendant is in the heart.