Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Defendant

A has served as the representative director of B from June 27, 2009 to April 3, 2012, and Defendant B is a corporation with the purpose of export and import business.

Where anyone intends to export goods, he/she shall report to the head of a customs office the name, standard, quantity and price of the relevant goods and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree, and in such cases, he/she shall not export goods without meeting permission, approval, recommendation, certification, or other conditions necessary for export in accordance with Acts and subordinate statutes or shall not export goods with illegal means; and animals and animals products, such as the bones, bones, internal organs, etc. of animals and animals, which are designated objects subject to quarantine in accordance with the Act on the Prevention

1. On July 14, 201, the Defendant issued a livestock products quarantine certificate issued by the Director of the National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service by reporting as if it were an item (type H) that does not require verification of the requirements of the amount equivalent to the amount of 2.5 tons in freezing originals (FREN DUCOFOF 2,319,702 won in the market price) to be exported to the customs office after being subject to quarantine by the Director of the National Institute of Animal Research and Quarantine under the Act on the Prevention of Contagious Diseases and Quarantine of Livestock Diseases, and after being issued a livestock products quarantine certificate by the Director of the National Institute of Animal Research and Quarantine from March 6, 201, the Defendant failed to obtain a livestock products quarantine certificate issued by the Director of the National Institute of Animal Research and Quarantine by reporting as if it were an item (type H) that is not required to be confirmed that the amount of 20 times in the total number of by-products of 517.13,261,370

2. Defendant B, a representative director, committed an act of violating the law as above with respect to the Defendant’s business at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1..