If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is the representative of the Hyundai Automobile Branch C Business Department of the Union B.

In Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd., the first half-yearly brand type C in 2017, Ga70, which is a new model of the first half-round brand C, shall be charged in C, and the test car, which is a test vehicle, shall be charged in small number to the existing manufacturer, and the assembly work shall be performed from May 17, 2017 to the existing manufacturer.

5. T 1k until 22. From June 8, 2017

6. From July 4, 2017 to July 4, 2017, T 3 car was put into the tea.

On July 4, 2017, the Defendant was unable to operate the said body assembly marc by up to 11:42 of the same day on the grounds that the separate demands that had been made by labor at the time of the agreement to increase the existing E Q900 from the Ulsan Factory C in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si around 100, had not been implemented properly until July 4, 2017, and that there was no labor-management consultation on the production of TM in G70, there was no labor-management consultation on the production of the above CM 51Ra B/C 503 process, and the Defendant suspended the operation of the above body assembly marc by up to 11:42 of the same day.

As such, the Defendant, by force, was unable to operate a vehicle assembly for about 55 minutes, thereby resulting in a loss equivalent to KRW 8,544,745 of the Victim Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to filing a complaint and on-site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;