On November 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the support of Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 12, 2016.

The Defendant: (a) conspired with in sequence with the name and influence of a criminal organization, which is a single criminal organization, to commit an unlawful telephone financing fraud (hereinafter “Ssing”), and (b) conspired with the Defendant to take charge of taking charge of the act of deceiving money by misrepresenting the lending company, prosecutor’s office investigator, etc. to many unspecified people; and (c) the Defendant conspired to withdraw money deposited under the above name influsing order.

On the other hand, on July 10, 2015, the person under whose name is not the victim's name assumes the sti Capital E, a lending company, at a place where it is impossible to know the location of the light, and assumes the victim D by telephone.

The phrase “a bank send money of KRW 1,50,000,000 necessary to erase existing credit inquiry information” was false, as it would reduce loans.

However, in fact, the staff of the Bosishing has thought that they would deceive the victim and have no intention or ability to borrow the money to the victim even if they have received the money from the victim.

The victim is the victim of the same year.

7.13. Transfer 150,000 won to the new bank account (G) in the F name.

Around 12:12 on the same day, the Defendant, who received the order of withdrawal from the above person in bad name, withdrawn KRW 1,540,000 from the 212-o, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-ro, the “Secheon-dong Branch of a New Bank” located in the above F, using the F’s physical fitness card, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above-mentioned person, received 1.55 million won from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H and D;

1. Details of transfer of funds from damage;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to judgment);

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 347 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. To treat concurrent crimes;