However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 18, 2016, at around 00:50 on March 18, 2016, the Defendant driven B Lone Star Co., Ltd in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.073% at approximately 500 meters from the front of the cafeteria-dong 1004 "Madro church" in front of the same cafeteria-dong 1004.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Inquiry of criminal history, investigation report (report on confirmation of criminal records of the same kind of crime as the suspect), application of the summary order-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order was that the defendant, in fact, was driving at once without any special reason despite the fact that he/she had the ability to drive drinking.

However, the attitude to reflect the crime of this case is shown.

In addition to the above points, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be considered, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.