However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 06:50 on December 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, such as: (b) in front of C, which was under the influence of alcohol at the convenience store, the Defendant, who was urged to return home from E, belonging to the head of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station D Zone for the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, which was called after receiving a report of an emergency bell of convenience store because he was under the influence of alcohol at the convenience store; and (c) who was urged by the Defendant to “this spack spacks, spacks, and has died when she was under the influence of alcohol.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the scene and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and divided, that there is no record of more severe punishment than the fine, and that the degree of assault by the police officer