2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime, and that the value of the goods removed from the seizure label is not significant.

B. However, the Defendant removed the attachment indication and transferred it to another place for the part of the goods on which the attachment indication is attached. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case, as the state function, is prejudicial to the function of indicating compulsory disposition; and (b) the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the argument of this case, are considered in favor of the Defendant.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.