beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.06.04 2013고단196

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 won in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the Young-gu Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on January 28, 2010, and completed the execution of the above imprisonment.

1. At around 14:50 on March 16, 2013, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by saying, “The victim E, who was known to the general public, is a bad in the drinking place by the solicitation of the above conduct.” The victim E, on the ground that the cafeteria and the customer are placed in the drinking place, the victim’s cafeteria and the customer are able to see it.”

2. On March 16, 2013, at around 15:00 on March 16, 2013, the injured Defendant: (a) the victim F (the 56-year-old age), who is the principal restaurant, (b) was the victim F (the 56-year-year-old age-old) who follows the Defendant’s behavior, followed the victim’s face and breast part by drinking, and pushed the victim into both arms.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim about two weeks of treatment, which requires two-time treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Each investigation report (in the event of attachment of the victim's F diagnosis report, and the victim's F b violence photograph);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiries, such as criminal records, investigation reports (A), and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes. The defendant asserts to the effect that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical disorder or mental disorder, such as that the defendant was drunk at the time of each crime of this case

According to the records, the fact that the defendant was drinking at the time of committing each of the crimes of this case was true.