beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.03 2016고단565

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around the new wall market of a eustic farmer located in the Ansan-do-dong-dong-dong-dong-si; (b) at the CAW-owned car owned by the wife B (n, 24 years old); and (c) while the Defendant fighting of the married couple, the Defendant left the front of the said car with the string of his cell phone, and broken the front glass door of the car.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the road in front of the new wall market above around 03:27, and “A male is accompanied by vehicles, and a female is standing in the side.

“The” means that, upon receipt of the report 112, the head of the Ansan Police Station D District E and the Assistant F, who was called up, seeks to take an on-site photograph after the Defendant requested the Defendant to make a statement and identification on the circumstances of the instant case, the head of the police station, and whether the police officer “in the case of marital fighting, the police officer was taken away, and the young young kis who were called up.”

Note Haba walk et al.

“I am the bath,” and assaulted F with the hands of F.I.D.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 366 of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders and the observation of protection;

1. Determination of types - Interference with the performance of official duties: Class 1 among crimes obstructing the performance of official duties - Crimes of damaging property: Class 1 among general crimes groups;

1. Special sentencing factors: each mitigated person -.