beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고정613

공중위생관리법위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a public health business entity making soup and making soup, with the trade name of “E” in Jeju City D.

The public bath business operator shall observe the sanitary control standards of a public health business operator, such as attaching a notice stating the inside of a shot room for sound business order and other “matters concerning the cares, etc. for persons, etc. who have not more than two hours after drinking”.

Defendant

A around January 30, 2014, around 02:43, the public health business operator failed to observe the matters to be observed by the public health business operator due to the failure to attach a notice of his/her desire and cautions to F, which is an engine room located in the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant criminal facts: Article 20 (2) 3 or Article 4 (7) of the Public Health Control Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The punishment is determined as ordered by considering all the following circumstances as the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The recognition of a crime and reflects on it; the age of 76 years old: The history of a fine imposed for a violation of the Public Health Control Act is four times (five million won in 2013, one million won in 201, one million won in 2009, five hundred thousand won in 2009, and three hundred thousand won in 300 in 201 in 2012) and other records of a fine imposed for a violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act by 2012: The non-guilty portion such as the defendant's occupation and family relation

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a public health business entity who conducts soup and soup, with the trade name of “E” in Jeju City D, and Defendant B is a person who works as employee in E.

No public bath business operator shall allow any person deemed difficult to use a bath normally due to drinking, etc. to enter the public bath for sound business order.