All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (one year of imprisonment and the return of the victim) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and that part of the damage caused by the crime of this case was temporarily returned or returned to the victims.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by intrusioning the part of the office, etc. at night at night after destroying the office, etc. of this case, or by intrusion into the office, etc. at night, theft of the victim C, K, AL, and AM cash, etc., embezzlement of the lost resident registration certificate by the victim F, forgery and use one copy of the first transaction application in the name of F, which is private document, and forgery and use two times, forgery of the F resident registration certificate through forgery and use of two copies of the application form in the name of F, which is private document, by deceiving the victim N, F, corporation by deceiving the victim N, corporation into two cell phone through forgery and use, and theft of two cell phoness. At night, the victim T, W, Z, AC, AE and H's cash, etc., which are owned by the above victims, and it seems that the agreement or damage recovery by the victims is not properly reached up to now, and there are no extenuating circumstances and circumstances that the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment after the new sentencing guidelines or sentencing.