beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.30 2018나39463

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of November 16, 2017, the Plaintiff, as the highest member of the C Party, made a statement at the C Party’s highest committee stating, “Absent warning to the D Government to increase the number of earthquakes against earthquakes, as well as a astronomical depth. D shall not be allowed to enter this bitco).”

B. As to the above, the Defendant made the following remarks (hereinafter “instant remarks”) at an interview with the F Radio “G” on the Eth day.

“조금 심하게 이야기해도 괜찮을까요.” “무당인가 그랬어요.” “그 사람들이 무당. 무당은 그런 소리 하겠지. 정치 최고위원이라는 사람이 하는 말이 무당 같고, 목사라고 하는 사람이 하는 말도 무당 같고. 무당이나 하는 소리지 어떻게 지진난 거 가지고 정부 탓하고 과세 탓하고. 그게 무슨. 말이 되는 소리를 해야죠.” “무당은 하늘 팔아서 자기 이익 챙기는 사람이잖아요. 사람들 겁주고. 지진이 경고라는 말이나, 참 말이 안 되고. 이런 일이 일어나면 그 지진 때문에 상처받고 고통당하는 사람들에게 집중해서 그들을 어떻게 하면 도울까 하는 생각을 해야지. 무슨 세금을 내니 안 내니 하는 엉뚱한 소리를 하는지 조금 답답해요.” "아니 그걸 뭘 어떻게 생각해요.

If it is found to have been wrong, it shall be promptly closed.

B. I would like to see that it would be able to see it.

Although the expression called the highest commissioner is also a fluor, it would be good if it is the lowest member of the match.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) The plaintiff's assertion (1) that the defendant's statement of this case infringed the plaintiff's social reputation, insults the plaintiff, and infringes the plaintiff's personal right by deviating from the limit of expression of opinion beyond the permissible limit under the social norms. Thus, the defendant is so.