Text

1. The Defendant’s decision against the Plaintiff on August 2012, 2012, the Incheon District Court Decision 2010Na1909, which was rendered by Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim: The objection raised on the premise that the plaintiff had no obligation to pay the purchase price to the defendant, since there was no fact that a sales contract was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant, which was the cause of applying for the payment order under paragraph (1) of this Article.