Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On March 20, 2020, the Defendant received a report of inter-floor noise trial costs from the police officer called “the competent police officer who returned to his house” and received a report of inter-floor noise trial costs from the apartment house B at Mapopo-si on March 20, 2020, and suffered an injury.

On March 20, 2020, the Defendant did not attend a shot and found the face of a police officer working without any justifiable reason at the top patrol box of the police station in the state of drinking around 01:50 on March 20, 2020, and taken the face of the police officer in his possession of the Defendant. In addition, the police officer’s defect in the act of disturbance, such as taking the Defendant’s bridge on the stoves of the police officer who served in the patrol box, issued warnings to him and her several times, but the police officer took several warning measures against him and her, but eventually, the Defendant neglected this and took an action of disturbance of revocation at the top patrol box of the police station in the state of drinking until 03:50 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (to be accompanied by video images in the form of revocation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the selective punishment of minor crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;