Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a taxi for business use B.

On December 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on December 22:30, 201, and led to the passage of the crosswalk from the center on the side of the half-month distance to the central Ne-distance.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a road by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected this and proceeded along as it is, the Defendant received the left-hand bridge part of the victim C (the age of 19) who crossed the above crosswalk from the right-hand side to the left-hand side of the said taxi.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as dynasium, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles under consideration;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;