However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was a director of the C Company’s Corporation located in Gyeonggi-si B, and was a victim D (V, 44 years old) who worked for the said C Company from November 21, 2016 to April 21, 2017 by taking charge of construction sections and material management affairs in the said C Company.

1. On February 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act by committing the crime in the middle of February 2017, at the above C office around 20:30 in the middle of February 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act by feling the victim’s her her son with his her son, following the victim who copied the documents.

2. The Defendant committed an indecent act in early April 2017, at the above C Office around 20:30 on Apr. 1, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act in line with the victim’s face knife with the victim’s knife knife knife with the victim’s knife knife knife.

3. The Defendant committed the crime of April 20, 2017, around 12:30 on April 20, 2017, committed an indecent act by the victim, following the victim, who completed the core meals in front of the Gyeonggi-si E, the first floor “F” restaurant. The Defendant committed an indecent act by committing the victim’s her son’s son.

4. The Defendant committed the crime of April 21, 2017, at the above C office around 07:15, around April 21, 2017, reported the victim’s hand to boom his head with a view to booming his head, and talking that the victim’s hand was “defluent and bad,” and the victim’s hand hand over his hand from the victim’s behind the victim’s end to the victim, and committed an indecent act against the victim’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The records in each recording and recording form [the defendant is the history of the victim and the teaching materials while denying the facts charged in this case. However, there is no obvious reason to deny the credibility of the victim's statement, and if the above evidence, such as recording, is combined with the victim's statement, the facts charged in this case has sufficient proof of guilt.

[Determination]

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime, and choice of imprisonment.