beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2018.11.29 2018고단287

사기방조

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 2018, the statement of the facts charged is that the Defendant, who received a text message to the effect that he/she would give a loan through Chok, will create a false bank transaction performance and offer a loan.

On the other hand, when money is deposited into the account under the name of the defendant, the money was withdrawn in cash and the account was requested to be delivered to the non-indicted employee. The defendant knew that the above was illegal, he accepted it, and then notified the above non-indicted 2 account in the name of the defendant.

On April 19, 2018, at the hearing of Franchiscison, 11:29 on April 19, 2018, the name Buddhistist made a false statement to the effect that he/she is entitled to receive a government-funded loan by 3.4%, a low interest rate of 3.4% from the victim D by putting his/her phone, and he/she is entitled to receive a loan by 3.4% from the lending company as he/she has failed to meet the current transaction performance to repay money to the lending company known to us, and he/she was paid KRW 23 million from the damaged party to H account at around 14:48 on April 20, 2018, and received KRW 23 million from the victim to the above B account in the name of the defendant around April 24, 2018.

On April 24, 2018, the Defendant withdrawn in cash KRW 20 million deposited by the victim according to the direction of the person without the name, at the J-dong branch located in Chocheon-si I on April 24, 2018, and then granted KRW 20 million in cash to the female in front of the J-dong office located in Chocheon-si K on the same day on the same day.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided the account to the person who was unaware of his name with knowledge that he committed the crime of fraud, and released the money acquired by the person who was unaware of his name and delivered it to the employee who was not aware of the fact that he committed the crime of fraud, thereby facilitating the crime of fraud of the person who was unaware of name.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel did not know that money deposited in the Defendant’s account was damage to telephone financing fraud.

Therefore, the defendant is guilty of aiding and abetting.