손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant G Educational Foundation G is the I Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
(2) On December 20, 2012, when the instant lawsuit was pending, the Defendant H was deceased on the part of the deceased’s heir, and the Plaintiffs taken over the instant lawsuit as the deceased’s heir.
B. (1) On April 2010, the Defendant Hospital was diagnosed with a chronic renal failure, and thereafter was hospitalized at the Heung-gu Hospital located in Heung-gu, Young-gu and was able to prevent a man-made blood donor who was administered during the course of administering the instant medical treatment. (2) On August 12, 2011, the net A sought to leave the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant H explained the need for inserting the blood scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics (hereinafter “instant medical treatment”).
3) In the process of the instant treatment, the term “hemmothorax” means that blood has been raised to the deceased A within the scarcity of waste. The occurrence of this case, Defendant H took emergency measures, such as scarbing, and Defendant H carried out scarbing and scarbing in order for K, who is the chest and father of the Defendant hospital, to stop the scarbing of the deceased A. 【No dispute with the grounds for recognition, the fact that there is no ground for recognition, and each description (including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply) of Party A and 3.
- The purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant H carried out the instant procedure in an unreasonable manner without any urgent necessity despite the lack of experience in the flat insertion operations. In the process, the defendant H caused the fluorous damage to the deceased A's emotional disorder and caused the fluority of the deceased. The defendants are liable to compensate the plaintiffs, the heir of the deceased, for the damages incurred to the deceased A due to the instant procedure.
3. Defendant H was negligent in medical treatment with regard to the instant treatment.