대여금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 84,657,534 as well as KRW 30,00,000 among them, from September 17, 2014 to the day of full payment.
In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the defendant, on July 12, 2005, prepared and delivered a loan certificate stating the loan amount of 45,00,000 won, maturity of 10% per annum on July 22, 2005, and interest rate of 10%, to the plaintiff on July 12, 2005. In light of this, the defendant, barring any special circumstance, is obligated to pay 84,657,534 won (i.e., principal amount of 30,000,000 won, interest and interest interest rate of 54,657,534 won per annum from July 12, 205 to August 20, 2014 as interest rate of 20% per annum from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case to September 17, 2014.
In regard to this, the defendant borrowed money from the plaintiff not only is the defendant but also C, and the defendant has been employed as the employee of D operated at the time, and only prepared a loan certificate with the plaintiff and C not forced. Thus, it is argued to the purport that the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's request. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.